Working Families Party Endorsement Questionnaire Answers
Home Page

Letter from Arline Parks

Volunteer and Contribute

En Espanol

On the Issues

Guest Book Page

Working Families Party Endorsement Questionnaire Answers

NY League of Conservation Voters Questionnaire

Statement on NYC Solid Waste Plan

This is an endorsement form from the Working Families Party driven by issues important to unions, workers, tenants and families.  Review for your self Arline Park's position on the issues.

We are proud to announce that the local review committee voted overwhelmingly to endorse Arline Parks 10 in favor with 2 abstentions!

           

 

 

 

 

------- ------- Party

2005 New York City Endorsement Questionnaire

17th Council District

 

Candidate Information

 

Name: Arline Parks

  

Campaign Manager:      Mr. Wallace Hasan

 

Campaign Committee:   The People’s Committee For Change

 

Phone (campaign hq):   718-585-1398                         

            (Field Cell)                   718-715-5825

Candidate Email:           Vidypati@cs.com         WEBSITE:  http://parksforcouncil.20fr.com

 

Campaign Manager Email:        Vidypati@cs.com, parksforcouncil@yahoo.com

 

Office Sought: __City Councilmember__________  District #:______17_____

 

THE CITY BUDGET

 

We believe that increases in progressive taxes are in general fairer and less economically harmful than service cuts, and expects its endorsed candidates to vote accordingly. In particular, they should support an increase in progressive taxes, which fall most heavily on the rich, including the corporate and personal income tax, the commuter tax and stock transfer tax. All city services have suffered significant cuts in recent years. Given the continued fiscal crisis faced by the City, the --Party believes it would be highly irresponsible to roll back the PIT increases agreed to in 2003. Success in maintaining the City’s revenue base and in closing any budget gap through progressive revenue increases will be a primary criterion for -- Party endorsements in future New York elections.

 

Will you support the following city revenue measures?

            (check all that apply)

            _X__ Delaying or canceling the rollback of the 2003 personal income tax increases

            _X__   Increasing the City personal income tax on the highest earners

            _X__   Closing corporate loopholes in the City’s tax code

            _X__   Restoring the commuter tax

            _X__   Restoring the stock transfer tax

           

In what ways will you work with the --Party to win passage for these revenue measures?

(check all that apply)

_X__   by sponsoring legislation in the City Council

_X__   by holding a joint press conference with the Working Families Party

_X__   by lobbying other elected officials

 

GOOD JOBS FOR ALL NEW YORKERS

 

Living Wage

In 2002, the City Council passed a Living Wage bill. While the --Party strongly supported this bill, the Party opposed the decision, late in the process, to remove recipients of economic development subsidies from the bill. In the original language, recipients of more than ,000 in subsidies (including tax abatements) or million in tax-exempt bond financing, and owners/managers of buildings leasing 20,000 or more feet to the City, would have been covered on the same terms as City contractors. This would provide substantial raises to over 3,000 janitorial, food service and security workers at a minimal cost to the affected businesses, and would establish the principle that subsidies to businesses need to benefit workers as well.

 

Would you support extending the City’s living wage bill to apply to businesses receiving economic subsidies from the City and leasing substantial property to the City on the same terms as City contractors?

            _X__ Yes        ___ No

 

Would you support setting the living wage for building service workers based on the prevailing industry wage?

            _X__ Yes        ___ No

 

What is your view on a requirement that certain businesses either provide health insurance or pay into a city fund that would provide insurance for their workers?

            _X__ Support  ___ Oppose

 

Do you support Intro. 468, the NYC Health Security Act, which would create such a requirement?

            _X__ Yes        ___ No

 

Right to Organize

Unions are necessary to counterbalance the power of employers and defend the interests of workers. The right to join a union is fundamental to a free society. The --Party expects candidates receiving its endorsement to support unions in their efforts to organize workers and win fair contracts. It is not enough to support the right to a union in the abstract; --candidates must be prepared to publicly support unions in conflicts with employers.

 

Will you pledge to honor all picket lines and to publicly support striking workers?

_X_ Yes          __ No

 

Will you speak at a press event or walk a picket line in support of striking workers?

            _X_ Yes                      __ No

 

Will you send a letter urging workers facing a union recognition election to vote “Yes”?

            _X_ Yes                      __ No

Will you publicly call on any Westchester employer facing a union organizing drive to voluntarily recognize the union?

            _X_ Yes                      __ No

Will you pledge not to oppose unionization of any public employees in your jurisdiction?

_X_ Yes          __ No

 

Will you use all legal means to deny public funding to businesses or agencies which have opposed efforts by their workers to organize?

_X_ Yes          __ No

 

Will you support legislation ensuring that no public money goes to “union-busting” law firms – firms with anti-union records?

_X_ Yes          __ No

 

Do you support the right of all workers to organize without fear of retribution, including temporary workers and day-laborers?

_X_ Yes          __ No

 

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

 

Investments in Transportation and Infrastructure

To rebuild New York’s economy for the long run, the --Party supports a sectoral approach. The goal of city economic development planning should be to identify key public investments required by those sectors of the New York economy which provide the best employment opportunities for New Yorkers with a variety of backgrounds and education and skill levels. The City’s current approach to economic development involves haphazard subsidies to individual companies with inadequate public scrutiny, no long-term strategy for diversifying the economic base, and inadequate requirements for companies receiving subsidies. A sectoral approach would be different in several ways. First, it would mean encouraging a more diverse set of sectors, compared with the near-exclusive focus in recent years on a handful of industries, notably securities. Second, it would involve identifying key infrastructure investments rather than subsidies to individual firms. Third, it would involve greater transparency and public accountability in economic development spending. Finally, it would include strong, binding job-creation targets for subsidy recipients.

 

Do you support a sectoral approach to economic development?

_X_ Yes          __ No

 

In general, do you support reducing or eliminating subsidies to individual companies, and replacing them with investment in City infrastructure?

_X_ Yes          __ No

 

Do you support strengthening Local Law 69, which governs public reporting on economic development spending, to increase public disclosure of subsidy amounts and outcomes?

_X_ Yes        

Support Arline Parks for City Council

She lives the issues!

We can do better, and we will do better.

Arline Parks has a stronger vision.

Get involved.  We need you to inform this campaign.  I will be accountable to the people of my District, and no one else.  I welcome your ideas and suggestions.  Contact me today, or sign the Guest Book.  Thank you for your support.


 


Vote Februaray 15th for Arline Parks!